|
International Action
Organization
|
|
|
THE PROJECT FOR THE NEW AMERICAN CENTURYMoveOn
Bulletin Subscribe online at: SPECIAL FEATURE:
INTERVIEW SENATOR BYRD What are your questions
for Senator Byrd? We'll ask MoveOn users' five favorite questions on Wednesday,
and report the Senator's answers in the next issue. Post your questions and
review others' at: CONTENTS: ------------------------------
INTRODUCTION: AMERICAN LEADERSHIP, AMERICAN EMPIRE The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) is a Washington-based neo-conservative think-tank founded in 1997 to "rally support for American global leadership." PNAC's agenda runs far deeper than regime change in Iraq. Its statement of principles begins with the assertion that "American foreign and defense policy is adrift" and calls for "a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity." While their tone is high-minded, their proposal is unilateral military intervention to protect against threats to America's status as the lone global superpower. The statement is signed by such influential figures as Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush, Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Dan Quayle, Donald Rumsfeld, and Paul Wolfowitz. PNAC is not alone, nor did it arise from new wells of power. Most of the founding members of PNAC held posts in the Reagan or elder Bush administration and other neo-conservative think-tanks, publications, and advocacy groups. The effect of PNAC's ideology is great on Bush -- the presidential candidate who promised a "humble," isolationist foreign policy. The events of September 11, 2001 provided a window of opportunity for furthering PNAC's agenda of American empire. Understanding that agenda can help us anticipate the Bush administration's next steps and organize accordingly. ------------------------------ ONE LINK ------------------------------ FORMING
THE BUSH DOCTRINE In 1992, Paul Wolfowitz, then-Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, authored an internal policy brief on America's military posture in the post-Cold War era: to prevent the emergence of a new rival power through preemption rather than containment and acting unilaterally if necessary to protect U.S. interests. When a draft was leaked to the press, controversy erupted and the report had to be softened. The web accompaniment to
the PBS Frontline special "The War Behind Closed Doors" features an excellent
chronology showing how Wolfowitz's draft would become the basis of the Bush
Doctrine. ------------------------------ PAX
AMERICANA RAD rejects cuts in defense spending, insisting that "Preserving the desirable strategic situation in which the United States now finds itself requires a globally preeminent military capability both today and in the future." Core missions for the U.S. military include the ability to "fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars" and to reposition permanent forces in Southeast Europe and Southeast Asia. Other samples from RAD: "The United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein." "At present the United States faces no global rival. America's grand strategy should aim to preserve and extend this advantageous position as far into the future as possible." "[N]ew methods of attack -- electronic, 'non-lethal,' biological -- will be more widely available ... 'combat' likely will take place in new dimensions: in space, 'cyber-space,' and perhaps the world of microbes ... advanced forms of biological warfare that can 'target' specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool." In this Atlanta
Journal-Constitution opinion piece, Jay Bookman compares "Rebuilding America's
Defenses" with the current Bush defense policy. You can read the entire
document on PNAC's website. ------------------------------ SEPTEMBER
11, 2001 Shortly after September
11, PNAC sent a letter to President Bush welcoming his call for "a broad and
sustained campaign" and encouraging the removal of Saddam even if Iraq could not
be directly linked to the attacks. ------------------------------ WHO'S
STEERING THIS SHIP? PAUL WOLFOWITZ is Deputy
Defense Secretary, second-in-command at the Pentagon. Wolfowitz was promoting
regime change in Iraq and a strategy of preemptive attack in 1992, but the elder
Bush rejected his views as too radical. This is an excellent brief from the
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. RICHARD PERLE was
Assistant Secretary of Defense in the Reagan administration and a foreign policy
adviser in George W. Bush's presidential campaign. He accepted Rumsfeld's offer
to chair the Defense Policy Board, transforming it from obscurity to influence.
In March, Perle resigned as chairman after a controversial lobbying scandal, but
remains on the Board as a member. WILLIAM KRISTOL is editor
of The Weekly Standard, a conservative political magazine with a small but elite
readership, funded by Rupert Murdoch. The son of neo-conservative founding
father Irving Kristol, he is the president of PNAC. Other important participants are Vice-President Dick Cheney; Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld; Iran-contra scandal convict Elliott Abrams, now Director of Middle East Affairs for the National Security Council; Washington Post columnist Robert Kagan; and special presidential envoy to Afghanistan and Iraq Zalmay Khalilzad. A fairly complete list of
PNAC participants can be found here: ------------------------------ WHO PAYS
THE BILLS? ------------------------------ PAX
ISRAELICA? This essay describes many
of the familiar neo-conservatives as having "dual loyalties," making policy
decisions in the interests of the State of Israel as much as the United States. ------------------------------ POST-WAR
IRAQ ------------------------------
NEO-CONSERVATISM Similar overlap is found among all the neo-conservative think-tanks -- Hudson Institute, Center for Security Policy, Washington Institute for Near East Policy, Middle East Forum, and Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs -- giving the agenda of a few political elites the appearance of widespread agreement. ------------------------------ WHAT NEXT
-- SYRIA? IRAN? ------------------------------
CHALLENGING THE PROJECT FOR THE NEW AMERICAN CENTURY ------------------------------
CONCLUSION Money makes it easy to organize networks and gain political influence; control of the media limits our ability to consider the various options America has for handling crises in the international community. The work we are doing as MoveOn members is organizing without massive wealth and educating without owning the media. Our work is to vocalize the love of democratic decision-making shared by all people, clearly and with the most complete information. Please let us know what information you need to do this work, and we will do our best to make it available through the bulletin. ------------------------------ CREDITS Editing team: ------------------------------ ABOUT THE MOVEON
BULLETIN AND MOVEON.ORG MoveOn.org is an
issue-oriented, nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that gives people a voice in
shaping the laws that affect their lives. MoveOn.org engages people in the civic
process, using the Internet to democratically determine a non-partisan agenda,
raising public awareness of pressing issues, and coordinating grassroots
advocacy campaigns to encourage sound public policies. You can help decide the
direction of MoveOn.org by participating in the discussion forum at: |
|
Political violence is an act of force, intimidation or abuse by a group or individual aimed at influencing, maintaining or seizing political power. The time has come to end such illegitimate violence perpetrated by our own United States government. Send mail to InterAct's Webmaster with questions or comments about this web site. Last modified: 02/08/06
|